Nelson's still kicking, you know: see http://gzigzag.sourceforge.net/ for
some recent spin-offs.

-- Max

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Casey Ransberger
<casey.obrie...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Alan Kay <alan.n...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Loup
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>
>
>> However, Ted Nelson said a lot in each of the last 5 decades about what
>> kinds of linking do the most good. (Chase down what he has to say about why
>> one-way links are not what should be done.) He advocated from the beginning
>> that the "provenance" of links must be preserved (which also means that you
>> cannot copy what is being pointed to without also copying its provenance).
>> This allows a much better way to deal with all manner of usage, embeddings,
>> etc. -- including both fair use and also various forms of micropayments and
>> subscriptions.
>>
>
> If only we could find a way to finally deal with all that
> intertwingularity!
>
>
>> One way to handle this requirement is via protection mechanisms that
>> "real objects" can supply.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>   ------------------------------
>> *From:* Loup Vaillant <l...@loup-vaillant.fr>
>> *To:* fonc@vpri.org
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 1, 2012 6:36 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [fonc] Sorting the WWW mess
>>
>> Martin Baldan wrote:
>> > That said, I don't see why you have an issue with search engines and
>> > search services. Even on your own machine, searching files with complex
>> > properties is far from trivial. When outside, untrusted sources are
>> > involved, you need someone to tell you what is relevant, what is not,
>> > who is lying, and so on. Google got to dominate that niche for the right
>> > reasons, namely, being much better than the competition.
>>
>> I wasn't clear.  Actually, I didn't want to state my opinion.  I can't
>> find the message, but I (incorrectly?) remembered Alan saying that
>> one-way links basically created the need for big search engines.  As I
>> couldn't imagine an architecture that could do away with centralized
>> search engines, I wanted to ask about it.
>>
>> That said, I do have issues with Big Data search engines: they are
>> centralized.  That alone gives them more power than I'd like them to
>> have.  If we could remove the centralization while keeping the good
>> stuff (namely, finding things), that would be really cool.
>>
>> Loup.
>> _______________________________________________
>> fonc mailing list
>> fonc@vpri.org
>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> fonc mailing list
>> fonc@vpri.org
>> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Casey Ransberger
>
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> fonc@vpri.org
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
>
>
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
fonc@vpri.org
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to