In a sense, but on a higher level, it's more focused on the stretegic desgin.
http://impactmapping.org/drawing.php Also take a look at for related modelling technique http://www.b-mc2.com/2013/04/26/from-business-strategy-to-solution-a-unified-conceptual-framework/ And for that matter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking_processes_%28theory_of_constraints%29 BR, John On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 8:00 PM, John Carlson <yottz...@gmail.com> wrote: > What is an impact map model? Is it something like a use case? > On Sep 5, 2013 12:33 PM, "John Nilsson" <j...@milsson.nu> wrote: > >> Even if the different domains are different it should still be possible >> to generalize the basic framework and strategy used. >> I imagine layers of models each constrained by the upper metamodel and a >> fitness function feeding a generator to create the next layer down until >> you reach the bottom executable layer. >> In a sense this is what humans do no? Begin with the impact map model , >> derive from that an activity model, derive from that a high level activity >> support model, derive from that acceptance criteria, derive from that >> acceptance test examples, derive from that a low level interaction state >> machine an so on... >> >> In the human case I belive the approach modelled by the kanban katas >> seems appropriate. Nested stacks of hypotheses to try in a disciplined PDCA >> cycle. >> >> BR >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> fonc mailing list >> fonc@vpri.org >> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc >> >> > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > fonc@vpri.org > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > >
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list fonc@vpri.org http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
