Glen Mazza wrote: > No response on the below questions from any committer, > and I'm concerned about the drop-off on the FOP-DEV > mailing list over the past few weeks (at an > extrapolated 170 emails on FOP-DEV for the month, this > would be our lightest month since Dec. 1999!)
At the moment, most of my design questions are answered, and it is merely :-) a question of finding time to implement. > I'd like us to continue progress on both Trunk and > Alt-Design until (1) at least one of the two methods > are finished or (2) they've been merged completely. I > would be happy to work as best I can towards both > goals. Do the committers need to have a vote on this? I think most of us treat Alt-Design as Peter's "baby" and expect him at some point to propose a reintegration of some or all of his work into the trunk. > We need to get working again. There are probably multiple opinions about how best to proceed. My personal view is that our biggest problem is not integrating Alt-Design, but rather integrating the maintenance branch and the trunk so that we are releasing and developing in the same branch. To that end, I am (as we speak) trying to untangle Driver into Session, Document, and RenderContext objects, as the first step toward refactoring to LayoutStrategy. So I guess I am working along a different line, but working nonetheless. Nevertheless, your point is well taken. I will address the remainder of your email in a subsequent message. Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
