Glen,

but the fact that you're already monitoring batik-dev already shows me
that you're de-facto monitoring the project. Help keep an eye on how
things go on over there. You don't need write access to Batik's codebase
to do that. That's all that's needed. One part of the XML Graphics
proposal (at least for me) is to work closer together. Maybe to develop
common components later. That's another reason I'd like to have you in
the PMC. You've contributed a lot to the XML Graphics discussion without
being in the XML PMC in the first place. Shows me that you care. The
biggest part to get this working is to set up the resolution and charter,
from then on I don't think there's a lot to do. The XML PMC list is not
that active. Please reconsider.

On 21.06.2004 00:52:04 Glen Mazza wrote:
> I do know, however, that I don't need the headache of being concerned 
> about it, or the maintenance responsibility for it should something be 
> wrong.  I have way too much work on FOP.  And see nothing gained by 
> being (1) responsible for a product while (2) not having write access to 
> it.  (Even if I did get write access, SVG is not one of my main 
> interests anyway.)  Accordingly, I'm taking myself out of this PMC 
> proposal--I don't care to sit on this PMC.  But thanks for your offer.


Jeremias Maerki

Reply via email to