--- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glen Mazza wrote: > > There are two possible API changes I am wondering > if > > we should make. > > Have another look at the API proposals in the old > Wiki. > > http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?FOPAvalonization >
Well, a bit too expansive for my (personal) tastes, at least for 1.0--but to be candid, much of it I still don't understand. Regardless, the resources we have for 1.0 IMO should be focusing on other areas (fo's/layout/renderers) at this time. Perhaps another reason for my recommendation for a "spartan" API similar to what we now have for 0.20.5. Our inputs I see for 1.0: --XSL FO document (or xml/xslt) --preferred render type --FOUserAgent and UserConfiguration, whatever portions of functionality/coding in each. That should be enough for us in 1.0, no? Those more elaborate API goals appear best discussed post-1.0, presumably once more vital parts of the system have been addressed. More thoughts, anyone? Simon, what would you be comfortable with API-wise in 1.0? Thanks, Glen
