-- "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glen Mazza wrote: > > That should be enough for us in 1.0, no? Those > more > > elaborate API goals appear best discussed > post-1.0, > > presumably once more vital parts of the system > have > > been addressed. > > A stable API is as important as other major > features. > If we do a mojor release, post-release API changes > should > be small and rare. >
Agreed, I have less problem however with *adding* to the API as FOP gets more powerful. But if we're going from 3 methods to 40, then, yes, we probably would need a new "major" release. Now whether the changes I proposing (and the state of the app after the rest of the system is more or less complete) would warrant a 1.0 or a 0.30 is not of concern to me. The API-enhanced version would just be a 2.0 or a 1.0, respectively. Thanks, Glen
