Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Such a move would have to be well-documented because some people could > (or probably will anyway) be upset when they upgrade and RTF just stops > working until they add fop-sandbox.jar. I'm sure there are a lot of > people perfectly happy with what the RTF handler produces. Sorry for being silent all the time after big words 'bout RTF-improvement of mine. Dropping: Bad, Micros~1-Office components aren't dropped even they don't work ;-) Right now I'm really busy with own projects but months ago I started to write a small document 'bout FOP-RTF-problems and sollutions. I'd like to return to this and give RTF a bit a push. I personally rely on RTF export and do it a lot including post-processing with Perl-Regex to get rid off some eeky stuff.
Why not just adding OpenDocument and leave RTF the way it is...? -- ------ http://krachlattenpaul.homelinux.org Home of Trackbase (1.3.0), VoiceLeadingCalculator (1.2.1) and the immortal Swear-O-Tron...
