Manuel Mall wrote:

<snip/>


Not completely, of course, but basically we wouldn’t advertise it,
and say that RTF support is provided as is, is no longer maintained,
and that users are on their own when using it. That way they would at
least be aware of the risks of going that route.


What about moving RTF to the sandbox? That should signal its incomplete / still in draft / not officially supported status.

I agree with Manuel. I dont think we should just drop it because I think there are a lot of people using it. Well thats the impression I get from all the questions that are asked about it. Moving it to the sandbox is a clear way of saying its unfinished and not supported.

Chris


Reply via email to