LL Sent from the Blackberry Tour ----- Original Message ----- From: Matthias Müller [mailto:pym...@yahoo.de] Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 02:53 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org <fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org> Subject: AW: AW: AW: [FOP 1.0] Worse performance than with 0.20.5 !?
I almost forgot the most important point: If I split the table after the 20th page (or rather: after each 200th table rows (assuming ~10 rows per page)), how do I ensure that the page-sequence ends at the page bottom. The size of the rows also may vary. Matthias ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ---- Von: Matthias Müller <pym...@yahoo.de> An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Gesendet: Freitag, den 21. Januar 2011, 8:31:15 Uhr Betreff: AW: AW: [FOP 1.0] Worse performance than with 0.20.5 !? I temporarily disabled all images and special fonts in my fo file and still have the issue with the heap space. So i assume that i only have a chance to improve the rendering by splitting the document in multiple page-sequences. The thing is now, that the size of the single tables may vary extremely. There's also a case that i produce a table over 400+ pages !!! What about splitting the tables after each, let's say, 20 pages? Where's the best performance, less than 20? ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ---- Von: Andreas Delmelle <andreas.delme...@telenet.be> An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Gesendet: Dienstag, den 18. Januar 2011, 18:14:38 Uhr Betreff: Re: AW: [FOP 1.0] Worse performance than with 0.20.5 !? On 18 Jan 2011, at 12:07, Matthias Müller wrote: Hi Mathias > indeed, in the document I only have one page-sequence over 500+ pages. > There are approx. 10 tables that stretch about 1 - 150 pages each. > There are also nested tables. > There are 3 images (< 30kb) on each page's footer. > Your idea is to rewrite the stylesheets that each table is enclosed by a > separate page-sequence. Am I right? That would be the most important change, indeed, but that would only be possible if there is no requirement to keep them together (i.e. to create pages containing the last rows of one table plus some rows of the next). If it is OK to have each table start on a new page, splitting into multiple page-sequences is definitely the first thing that I would try. Your images, I think, do not contribute to the memory usage. I assume they are fo:external-graphics, so they would be cached by URI, and there should normally be only one instance for each distinct image in the document. Regards Andreas --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org The information transmitted in this email and any of its attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain BioReference Laboratories proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to BioReference Laboratories. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete and destroy the communication and all of the attachments you have received and all copies thereof. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
