On úterý 28. března 2017 13:38:31 CEST Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 03:39:45PM +0000, Greg Sutcliffe wrote: > > I've been meaning to reply to this for about a week, sorry for the delay. > > This is a topic I've been thinking about for a *long* time, so apologies > > for the long thread :P > > Let me be even later to the party. > > > I think there's two issues here. One is *how* to have the discussion, and > > the other is how to *end* the discussion. From the comments so far, it > > seems we're still somewhat split on point 1, but we're all agreed we need > > to find a solution to point 2. As such, I'm only going to discuss point > > 2, as that's where we currently struggle. > > While I agree that we need a better way to end discussions, I think that > on point 1 we can improve as well. To me it feels like we lack > visibility. It has been suggested to move back to the mailing list since > that has more visibility. Others have suggested discussions on github > are easier to read back. I'd suggest that we adopt the github bot to > notify the ML of certain events. Some things I can think of are created, > reached impasse, closed or merged. For reached impasse we could use a > label or [impasse]. A timer could also work.
I like this idea a lot -- Marek -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
