Hm, I ran it without any options - would that be equivalent to -g then? A rather awkward workaround might be to compile one source file containing this code with -g, but that is pushing things to the limit.
Regards, Arjen Op wo 1 jun. 2022 om 12:16 schreef Kay Diederichs < kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de>: > I tried your suggestion below, but it does not store the options unless > the -g option is used. > > If -g is used, the executable _always_ has version and option info (no > extra code invoking compiler_version() and compiler_options() is > needed). Just use strings <binary> | grep GNU . > If -g is not used, no option info is in the executable. > > Best wishes, > Kay > > On 01.06.22 12:00, Arjen Markus wrote: > > staticv.f90 -- > > ! Static information about the compiler? Not via parameters > > ! > > program staticv > > use iso_fortran_env > > > > implicit none > > character(len=200) :: c, d > > > > c = compiler_version() > > d = compiler_options() > > write(*,*) c(1:1), d(1:)1 > > end program staticv > > > > -- > Kay Diederichs http://strucbio.biologie.uni-konstanz.de > email: kay.diederi...@uni-konstanz.de Tel +49 7531 88 4049 > Fachbereich Biologie, Universität Konstanz, Box M647, D-78457 Konstanz > > This e-mail is digitally signed. If your e-mail client does not have the > necessary capabilities, just ignore the attached signature "smime.p7s". >
