On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:34:09PM -0500, Joshua Paine wrote: > On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 09:10 -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki_rules > > I re-read this and noticed again the rationale for using the simple wiki > rules included instead of an existing wiki language. Given the > rationale, I think Markdown would be a better choice.
I'm curious, what are your thoughts on the diff algorithm on fossil? I personally liked the algorithm I did way back in the day that used a non-linear delta from a suffix array of the target side and LCS analysis of the source. Or, if that's too complex, let's get back to bikeshedding the wiki syntax: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshedding -- Zed A. Shaw http://zedshaw.com/ _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
