Zed,

To some people the documentation of their project is of vital importance and 
the ability to do that self contained in Fossil is not a minor or marginal 
issue. Fossil works fantastic for me, the only problem I see right now is 
the lack of ability to easy document my project. Fossil see's this as 
important also as it decided to include a wiki in the first place. I see it 
as such an important task that when choosing between Trac or Fossil for my 
major projects, I will continue to use Trac simply because I can document my 
project easily. Until it is as easy to document  it in Fossil as it is Trac, 
I will continue to be a Trac/Hg user. Once we can document easily in Fossil, 
I'm all there. and, btw, I'm not a casual Fossil user. I have contributed 
code to Fossil when it was first starting. I did the server TCP/IP code of 
Fossil to the Windows environment so that I could use the server features on 
Windows. So, I am all for Fossil, I just place a large importance on the 
developers documenting the project as well as developing the project. The 
idea of this being self contained in 1 tool such as Fossil is fantastic but 
it's not there yet, thus I started this thread.

Jeremy

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Zed A. Shaw" <zeds...@zedshaw.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 3:18 AM
To: <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org>
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] The case for Markdown (yes, I rtfm)

> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 11:34:09PM -0500, Joshua Paine wrote:
>> On Sat, 2009-11-28 at 09:10 -0500, D. Richard Hipp wrote:
>> > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki_rules
>>
>> I re-read this and noticed again the rationale for using the simple wiki
>> rules included instead of an existing wiki language. Given the
>> rationale, I think Markdown would be a better choice.
>
> I'm curious, what are your thoughts on the diff algorithm on fossil?  I
> personally liked the algorithm I did way back in the day that used a
> non-linear delta from a suffix array of the target side and LCS analysis
> of the source.
>
> Or, if that's too complex, let's get back to bikeshedding the wiki
> syntax:
>
> http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bikeshedding
>
> -- 
> Zed A. Shaw
> http://zedshaw.com/
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
> 
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to