On Sat, 2009-12-05 at 11:46 -0800, Kurtis Rainbolt-Greene wrote: > If the feature were put in wouldn't it just be "people with old fossil > needing to update"?
Yes, but... > I'm not sure I get why there's talk of "custom fossil". This is a > feature that a overwhelming majority want. But it's a feature that DRH said some time ago on the fossil site that he considered and rejected, and since he has stayed out of this conversation, I conclude that he's sticking to his decision or at best will reconsider only if some working code appears. If one were to implement markdown or some other more complete text formatting language in C, DRH might still not be willing to include it, so that route means hoping DRH will change his mind, or settling for a custom version of fossil. -- Joshua Paine LetterBlock: Web applications built with joy http://letterblock.com/ 301-576-1920 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
