On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:40:44PM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:36:46PM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: > >> I've stumbled upon a description of something, that I missed once or twice > >> in Fossil: > >> > >> http://nuclearsquid.com/writings/git-add/ > > > > I find that git work style of git add/commit (the head, the index, the > > working > > directory) very annoying. I'm quite happy fossil does not work that way. :) > > But this is *not* about the index. It's about finer granularity of committing.
Hm I still see that related, but I may be confused. If not, what will be the 'storage' for what is to be commited and what not? _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
