On 1/26/2012 11:40 AM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 20:38 , Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:36:46PM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:
I've stumbled upon a description of something, that I missed once or twice in
Fossil:
http://nuclearsquid.com/writings/git-add/
Nothing that great: an ability to commit only part of changes to a file.
>>> This kind of a thing can as well be scripted out, or implemented with
>>> use of an external merge program (I acutally manually set up to use
>>> vimdiff the few times I needed it).
Any opinions?
I find that git work style of git add/commit (the head, the index, the working
directory) very annoying. I'm quite happy fossil does not work that way. :)
But this is *not* about the index. It's about finer granularity of committing.
Exactly. This is actually one of the things which are nice in git, IMHO.
I love the ability to make a number of unrelated changes, or a bunch of related
changes and then still be able to commit them independently. Or in the case of
related stuff as a series of changes showing a nice progression in the
implementation.
How did your setup (with vimdiff) look like ?
--
Andreas Kupries
Senior Tcl Developer
ActiveState, The Dynamic Language Experts
P: 778.786.1122
F: 778.786.1133
andre...@activestate.com
http://www.activestate.com
Get insights on Open Source and Dynamic Languages at www.activestate.com/blog
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
