Michal Suchanek <hramr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 14 September 2012 18:49, Mike Meyer <m...@mired.org> wrote: >> Wes Freeman <freeman....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>The fact of the matter, though, is you can choose whether you want to >use >>>that feature of git or not; you're certainly not forced to use it. >> Well, you can choose whether or not to use it locally. But once you >share the repo, anyone you pull from can use it and force you to live >with all the things that caused you to decide not to use it. >What you pull from them is up to you when you do the pull. So you end up with two (or more) repos for the same project with different histories? And this is supposed to be better? I think I'm better off choosing software designed to do the job I want done. Which in this case is to preserving history. -- Sent from my Android tablet with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my swyping. _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
