On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 11:45:29 -0300 Richie Adler <richiead...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...] > That's the generous hypothesis. It's wild speculation. :-( First of all I do not see anything wrong if Fossil adopt some of the good ideas present in DVCS predecessors - e.g. using Sqlite for keeping artifacts (as Monotone). Second, ability to 'uncommit' is nothing specific to Git. Such feature is present in every DVCS (hg,bzr, mnt) I use(d) since Darcs which I used 9 years ago. Third...some of the points which I mentioned were discussed and/or asked for by other people as well and as far as I'm concerned I used Fossil two years ago while fiddling with Git is a recent affair of mine. > The paranoid one is that Git promoters really want to nullify all > differences between Git and Fossil and then say: "See? Fossil does > the same that Git does! And we have Github! And the community! And > etcetera!". Lastly, I do not believe that Git promoters are interested in anything except Fossil and do not care much what features other DVCS-es have. Fortunately, Richard is reasonable person integrating best of the features of other DVCS and learning based on other's mistake...clear sign of wisdom. > I like Richard's attitude of "Fossil is there to scratch my own > itches and it's doing fine like it is now". I'm just interested which version of Fossil is frozen for you 'cause there is no place for improving it any longer. :-) Sincerely, Gour -- An intelligent person does not take part in the sources of misery, which are due to contact with the material senses. O son of Kuntī, such pleasures have a beginning and an end, and so the wise man does not delight in them. http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
