On Dec 19, 2012, at 19:56 , Mike Meyer wrote: >> The big names have been created for huge teams, where people generally don't >> want to be overwhelmed by tentative work done by others. Therefore they work >> in isolation, issuing pull requests once the thing is done. Especially in >> Git it's popular to compress all the commits to be pulled into one big >> commit. But the important thing is the isolation. > > This is a description of workflows, not SCM properties.
Of course. But bear in mind that the tools are optimized for certain cases that creators had in mind. Fossil was created for a team of (IIRC) three employees of a single company. Git was created for a fuzzy community of some few thousands people. >> It stands in stark contrast to Fossil's "everybody has a copy of everything". > > Except for private branches. There's been some discussion about adding > more control over push/pull to fossil, but I don't believe it's > happened yet. Private branches are a pretty recent addition. I believe that the fine grained pushing/pulling will also come sooner or later, once one of folks involved with Fossil feels a need for it. Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
