On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell <vi...@viric.name> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 04:40:28PM -0600, Nico Williams wrote: >> And so on. Really. Large projects need order, they need process. >> They need clean trees in official repos. >> >> Without a way to clean history prior to pushing to / pulling into >> official repos a VCS is just hard to use effectively. > > I'm not against that; I understand that teams of projects want to organize > what > their "VCS history" looks like. > > What I meant is that (by now) git has only one way of providing such "clean > trees": > destroying the history.
That's a strawman. I very specifically suggested that a fossil rebase operation should *always* copy the branch being rebased and then rebase that copy. Now what on Earth could possibly be objectionable about that? Nico -- _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
