(this time to the list) On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:03 AM, j. van den hoff <veedeeh...@googlemail.com > wrote:
> thanks for the info. questions: this does not effect the "off by one" > between timeline and dbstat > in the fossil repo itself, right? > Correct - i haven't yet looked at that. > I believe division by "365.2425" instead would make the > conversion "exact on average" even for projects running many hundred of > years ;-). actually, > I checked right now, that this is correct: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/** > Leap_year <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_year>. > so I propose to insert the correct conversion factor and drop the > "approximately" from the report. Good tip - i'll patch that during my lunch break (i'm currently at work). -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
