On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org>wrote:

>
> When I  first learned  about fossil and  the integrated  tickets/wiki, I
> assumed that  both of these  features were also version  controlled just
> like any other might that might exist in the repository.


The Wiki is version controlled with a DAG, just like code.  But it is a
separate and independent DAG.  And the current user interface does not give
you access to the details of the change history.  That UI could be enhanced
to do that, if there is a need, but in 6 years nobody has complained and so
it has not yet happened.



> Why should they
> not  be? And  why should  they not  be just  as simply  accessible (e.g.
> source controlled) as any other file that I might place in a repository?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
> --
> TAI64 timestamp: 400000005190fbcc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>



-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to