Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:58:04AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org>wrote:
When I first learned about fossil and the integrated tickets/wiki, I
assumed that both of these features were also version controlled just
like any other might that might exist in the repository.
The Wiki is version controlled with a DAG, just like code. But it is a
separate and independent DAG. And the current user interface does not give
you access to the details of the change history. That UI could be enhanced
to do that, if there is a need, but in 6 years nobody has complained and so
it has not yet happened.
And now that there have been complains? :)
Does anyone want to endeavour the task?
I've the feeling that the question had come up before, but simply noone
developed a solution.
I also wonder if it effected the choice of whether to use fossil or not
for various projects. I know that, personally, there are a few places
that I've wanted to START with versioned documentation, and would have
jumped on Fossil in an instant if the pieces where there.
Miles Fidelman
--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
