FYI, dumpbin confirms that it's a 64-bit executable.

Pete


On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Michai Ramakers <m.ramak...@gmail.com>wrote:

> On 18 June 2013 02:15, Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> wrote:
> > There is a fresh build of Fossil for windows at:
> >
> >     http://www.fossil-scm.org/tmp/fossil-20130614-win.zip
>
> downloaded, but the binary inside the .zip doesn't run on my win32
> system. (Could it be a 64-bit binary? dependency walker hints at
> this).
>
> Instead, built using VS2008 a recent version (version 1.25
> [a6dad6508c] 2013-06-14 07:19:58 UTC) on win32 client and the same
> version on the *nix server.
>
> Rebuilding the repo using this new version on the server, and then
> cloning on the win32 box using this version on both sides
> unfortunately gave the same result as described in earlier mails.
>
> For the time being I will park the faulty/suspect repo somewhere, and
> create a new repo to work on. I'd be happy to assist in further
> debugging. (It's not necessary to provide prebuilt windows binaries
> for me, as apparently I can build these myself now - impressed as
> always with the clean and easy build-process :-)
>
> Thank you,
> Michai
> _______________________________________________
> fossil-users mailing list
> fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
> http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
>
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to