On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:28:29AM +0200, Michai Ramakers wrote:
> On 19 June 2013 10:25, Edward Berner <e...@bernerfam.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'm surprised, but yeah, its looking that way. I just ran the test again
> > using the same fossil binary on XP and Windows 7. The clone failed on XP
> > but succeeded on (64 bit) Windows 7. It also succeeds on 32 bit Vista but
> > fails on Windows 2000 (I had to use a different binary on Windows 2000).
> >
> > As a sanity check I served up a copy of Fossil's own repository in the same
> > way as my test repository. All systems were able to successfully clone it.
>
> That's a big help, thank you. Did you happen to also try cloning from
> WinXP to the same WinXP box, using either file:// or http:// with
> 'fossil clone' ?
>
I get same problem on my Windows XP SP3 virtual machine using normal
http:// protocol. But using file:// and ssh:// protocol, the clone was
successfull.
Also, I was able to open the resulting clone (when using http://), but
checkout was empty, and when I try to do a: "fossil pull", I got the
following error:
Error: bad command: pull <big sha1 number>
I didn't see that error during the clone, and I grep for "bad command"
in the source code and I found nothing..
Does it give some any hints to someone ?
--
Martin G.
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
