On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Themba Fletcher
<themba.fletc...@gmail.com>wrote:

> What about "libfree" as a portmanteau of lib, fossil, and three? I guess
> that crosses the line into humor a bit.
>

And sounds very GNU :/.


> More seriously though, fossil(3) is my favorite, but it does make it sound
> like it's an official part of the fossil project and actually implies, at
> least to me, that fossil(1) is built on top of it. Whether or not that
> implication is common and / or appropriate I'll leave to you to negotiate
> with Richard.
>

It also has the drawback of basically prohibiting the name (eventually)
"fossil v3". i also can't write -lfossil(3) (thought it would be funny).
So, yeah, fossil(3) is nice but too impractical. :(

-- 
----- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

Reply via email to