On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Themba Fletcher <themba.fletc...@gmail.com>wrote:
> What about "libfree" as a portmanteau of lib, fossil, and three? I guess > that crosses the line into humor a bit. > And sounds very GNU :/. > More seriously though, fossil(3) is my favorite, but it does make it sound > like it's an official part of the fossil project and actually implies, at > least to me, that fossil(1) is built on top of it. Whether or not that > implication is common and / or appropriate I'll leave to you to negotiate > with Richard. > It also has the drawback of basically prohibiting the name (eventually) "fossil v3". i also can't write -lfossil(3) (thought it would be funny). So, yeah, fossil(3) is nice but too impractical. :( -- ----- stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
