On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Stephan Beal <sgb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Themba Fletcher < > themba.fletc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What about "libfree" as a portmanteau of lib, fossil, and three? I guess >> that crosses the line into humor a bit. >> > > And sounds very GNU :/. > > >> More seriously though, fossil(3) is my favorite, but it does make it >> sound like it's an official part of the fossil project and actually >> implies, at least to me, that fossil(1) is built on top of it. Whether or >> not that implication is common and / or appropriate I'll leave to you to >> negotiate with Richard. >> > > It also has the drawback of basically prohibiting the name (eventually) > "fossil v3". i also can't write -lfossil(3) (thought it would be funny). > So, yeah, fossil(3) is nice but too impractical. :( > > -- > ----- stephan beal > http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ > http://gplus.to/sgbeal > > _______________________________________________ > fossil-users mailing list > fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users > > +1 for libfossil. I hate it when libraries have smart names requiring me to google for the package name to install.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
