On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 06:31:25PM -0400, Ron Wilson wrote: > On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Chad Perrin <c...@apotheon.net> wrote: > > > > Should I take it at this point that --incremental is deprecated and > > should not be used or expected to be present in future Fossil versions? > > So far, I have seen no responses that specifically addressed whether the > > behavior I expected from it was the intended behavior, whether anyone > > else might have the same problem indicating a bug in the software or > > whether this was confined to my situation and thus might be a local > > configuration issue, whether there was anything I could do to provide > > more information to help, and so on. The closest thing to meaningfully > > addressing the issue that I have seen was akin to the old joke . . . > > > > patient: Doctor, doctor, it hurts when I do this! > > doctor: Don't do that. > > I very much doubt that --incremental would be deprecated. I suspect that no > one else has tried your use case.
I'm stuck in kind of a no-win situation with this, then. It's not really appropriate to log a bug in an issue tracker without knowing it's a bug, but nobody will tell me if it's a bug, how I should judge whether it's a bug, or whatever else applies here. I'm not even sure yet that what I believe to be expected behavior is expected behavior, or whether I'm just using it wrong. . . . so while I wait to see if someone will give me some guidance, it will fall off everyone's radar, and nothing will be done, so that my only option going forward for some of these projects will be to just use Git. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] _______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
