2014-05-02 4:27 GMT+02:00 Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org>:
> I did some testing and it looks like fossil already had the correct
> timestamps. Perhaps whatever method you were using to get the data out
> of git was providing fossil incorrect timestamps?
If 2 people (Ingo and Andy) report that it's wrong, that's enough proof
for me. Backed-out now:
<http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/77f53423ae>
2014-05-02 0:08 GMT+02:00 David Given <d...@cowlark.com>:
> I originally started hacking this because I was exporting into Fossil and
> the timestamps weren't matching the original, so *something* is wrong
> somewhere. Unfortunately I'm currently camping away from my computer and
> can't go look up exactly what. It's possible that I was exporting from hg;
> in which case the bug might be on the export end. I'll try to find out more
> when I get back next week.
Please investigate further. You finished this work on 2013-12-22, while
Richard merged this 4 days AFTER the fossil-1.28 branch was split off
for release (2014-01-09). Now we know that was a good decision.
2014-05-02 0:01 GMT+02:00 David Given <d...@cowlark.com>:
> Are you sure that get merged? I remember asking for a sign-off a couple of
> times, but never got a response, and eventually abandoned it.
Sometimes patience is a good thing.
Thanks!
Jan Nijtmans
_______________________________________________
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
