On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Andy Bradford <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> wrote:
> Thus said Luca Ferrari on Fri, 29 May 2015 13:59:17 +0200: > > > But if I could say, the option "newbranch" does not look good at me, > > since it a little too long. > > Fossil can have both long and short names for a given option, but > perhaps --newbranch is too long. What about just --branch? > > Anyone else have an opinion on whether or not ``fossil edit'' should > exist? > It would be convenient, though, AFAICS, the only new functionality is branch moving.
_______________________________________________ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
