David Gerard wrote: > On 22 July 2010 21:01, teun spaans <teun.spa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think I am completely factual. After I wrote this, I went to the >> questionlist and found the cry "we dont censor" in one of the >> reactions. Which proves my point, I think. You yourself use that term >> in your email. > > > Well, we don't.
But you do. > Our mission - Wikimedia's bias - is that more information is better > than less information. If I were to make an account with the user name CumInYourCornflakes or HitlerMyHero there'd be someone all over the account within minutes, blocking banning, and deleting. > And "filtering" when applied by a third party is what censorship is. No it is NOT. It is not censorship if I choose not to see X, that is my choice. So long as YOU have the choice to see X if you want to then we can both live in harmony. The conflict arises when you say that I must see X, or if I say you must not see X. Where X is some broadly recognized category of offensive material. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l@lists.wikimedia.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l