On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Magdalen Berns <m.be...@thismagpie.com> wrote:
> >> Perhaps some might be seeing Richard as the FSF too quickly and not > giving due regard what he is actually saying about this in the reactions to > what he's putting forward. How he's defined "dodgy links" really does not > seem all that unreasonable or idealistic, because it takes into account the > important point that some members of the community might be excluded unless > they sacrifice their principles. I don't think it's necessary to agree with > *all* the ethics of the FSF to concede that this is a fair concern for > Richard to be putting forward for discussion. > > It seems strange (at best) that anyone would see it as nonconstructive for > us to actively seek to ensure we have a strong cooperative relationship > with the FSF community, where this is possible. Given that we are branded > as a free desktop software community, this seems like something we ought to > be taking more seriously. > My point is merely that my general impression is that the people who have disagreed during this discussion understand the nuances of what is being discussed.
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
