On Fri, 14 May 2010, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 16:52:30 +0200
Graeme Geldenhuys <[email protected]> wrote:
On 14 May 2010 16:41, Mattias Gaertner wrote:
I can send you my 49 smaller patches. But I doubt that would help.
Personally, I would have preferred that because it's easier to debug a
problem afterwards when things doesn't work. You have smaller commits
to work through. Having a 150K patch means I (and probably others that
didn't work on that patch) have no clue where to start looking for the
problem.
Well, I doubt that the patches would help here. I rewrote some parts
multiple times.
AFAIK deprecated and label were not supported, so I did not break
that.
The tiOPF code I tried to document with fpdoc did NOT fail with the
'label' or 'xxx of byte' syntax. Only after your commit did the errors
of that syntax appear.
Probably because the former parser only parsed the interface.
Maybe fpdoc now tries to parse the implementation too? That's not
needed, is it?
It should stop at the implementation keyword ?
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
