In our previous episode, Mattias Gaertner said: > Yes. > I think implementation needs good comments. The local types and > variables don't need fpdoc docs, do they? > If someone wants to use fpdoc for implementation, maybe it should > be made optional?
Mattias, what did you use for testing? makeskel/fpdoc? I've searched for a test that simply dumped the parsetree (e.g. to check if ^g is really transformed to something like a char/string literal), but haven't found anything. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - [email protected] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
