Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi
May I ask why do we need a CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT=y in the kernel to for fpc
to work on arm-linux?
The fpc target for eabi is called 'armel', the 'arm' target compiles for
oabi.
Regards, Micha
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Jeppe Johansen <jepj...@kom.aau.dk
<mailto:jepj...@kom.aau.dk>> wrote:
Well, this is off topic, but ARM is quite a bit backwards
compatible. All ARM versions are backwards compatible(if we ignore
thumb, which fpc doesn't support anyway) :)
Geoffrey Barton skrev:
On 14 Jul 2010, at 10:49, Bernd Mueller wrote:
Michael Schnell wrote:
On 07/14/2010 11:02 AM, Bernd Mueller wrote:
... which could easily be done in gcc btw. ...
I'm quite sure that FPC's ASM can compile hex constants
(using "DC" ???)
that is not the point. You don't wont to bother with (error
prone) hex constants, but want to use the regular assembler
mnemonics.
quite right! especially with a processor like the ARM, where it
keeps, er.., improving its instruction set between each
generation of hardware!
rgds,
Geoffrey
Regards, Bernd.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
<mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
<mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
<mailto:fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org>
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
