On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 18:47 +0000, Martin wrote: > On 11/01/2011 09:28, Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > > Same for variants and the enumerations. Your input is valuable, though. > > Maybe better to open bug-reports for the variants and enumerations. So > > it won't be forgotten. > I' ll be happy to open reports, I wasn't sure, since I can not tell if > an issue is fpc or gdb....
The problem is now that debug-problems aren't reported and no-one feels responsible for them because it could be that it's someone elses problem. Just report them, I (we) can always look if it is a gdb or fpc issue. And ask on the gdb lists for help. It's not as if you just add bugs to the bug-tracker, without any investigation or background-info. ;) > More: > array types, but similar for strings > > type > TDynIntArray = Array of Integer; > TStatIntArray = Array [5..9] of Integer; > var > VarDynIntArray: TDynIntArray; // named type > VarDynIntArrayA: Array of Integer; // "anonymous" type => hence > the "A" postfix of the var-name > VarStatIntArray: TStatIntArray; > VarStatIntArrayA: Array [5..9] of Integer; > > **** dynamic arrays Are fully implemented in Dwarf-3 and the gdb I've send. I don't think it is a good spending of my time to let the Dwarf-2 info give nice messages that it won't work. ;) It works with some luck in some cases. I don't think I'll spend time on that. But please open a bug-report. Maybe I or someone else will. Joost. _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel