18.05.2012 15:49, Joost van der Sluis написал:

Indeed. And I do have the symbol of the corresponding type and a list of
parameters already. I thought I needed a symbol/definition to store the
references. Else I would have to store those references in the
TPropertySym, but also in the symbol of the class. That doesn't look
good to me?

I think you need to store this information both in TStoredDef - for classes, records, enumerations, arays, ordinals, functions. At the same time you need to store it in tpropertysym, tfieldvarsym (maybe TStoredSym) since they are not definitions.

Best regards,
Paul Ishenin

_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist  -  fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel

Reply via email to