Am 20.08.2012 10:26, schrieb Graeme Geldenhuys: > > So the BIG question remains: When will the FPC team sit down and hash > out the details of implementing Unicode support? Please note, I'm not > saying "implement it", just saying... "agree on how it should be > implemented".
Fine with me: let's kick all those complicated utf-8 and utf-16 encodings and just use utf-32 for the unicodestring type, it's very simple to use, no platform is prefered over others, normal PCs have 8 GB+ today so memory is not an issue anymore neither is CPU power. Clean, simple, easy. > If the FPC team stays in a dead-lock, then maybe the > better option would be to allow the public to vote on it. And who implements it? The public votes as well? _______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel