On 05 Jan 2013, at 12:53, Martin Schreiber wrote: > So compiled with -Fcutf8 > " > unicodestringvar:= 'Best'#228'tigung'; > " > produces a different result on fixes_2_6 and trunk? I assume in trunk there > will be a compile error?
No. In both cases it results in a widestring with this content: .short 66,101,115,116,228,116,105,103,117,110,103,0 I guess invalid utf-8 values are just copied through by the compiler. As mentioned: absolutely nothing whatsoever changed in how character sequences are interpreted by the compiler in 2.7.x. The explanation you quoted above (and which I deleted) applies to both 2.6.x and 2.7.x. I really don't know how I can say this in another way, and repeating it clearly doesn't help. I think it's best if you compile trunk for yourself and test as many scenarios as you can, because I feel I cannot add anything further to the discussion, and I'm not interested in playing compile bot. Jonas_______________________________________________ fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
