On Thu, 25 Oct 2018, Sven Barth via fpc-devel wrote:
Personally I am also in favour of a more open technique instead of a
technique which is proprietary to a platform, and in this sense I
understand
and endorse your point of view, but beggars can't be choosers.
There is no problem to have both techniques available. As I wrote, the SEH
is the fastest path.
I have my doubts especially as the rtlunwind stuff of Kylix only works on
i386. The SEH mechanism between i386 and all other Windows platforms
differs significantly and I doubt that Simon only wants i386 to benefit.
If 'SEH is the fastest path.' is not correct, then all the more reason to use
DWARF...
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
