Ah curses. I fear it was something I did. I don't like the idea of
stepping through each revision until we find one that works.
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=38294
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=38334
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=38339
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=38343
Those ones relate to buggy optimisations in some way, but they might be
a bit too late on to affect 3.2.0.
There are quite a few others too - hmmm.
Gareth aka. Kit
On 13/06/2021 20:04, Martin Frb via fpc-devel wrote:
On 09/06/2021 09:29, Pierre Muller via fpc-devel wrote:
Martin,
could you check if this relates to bug #38973?
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=38973
This bug also does not show in current trunk.
If you get the same pattern of failures, it is most probably related
to this wrong optimization.
Unfortunately I had no success in narrowing it down.
I had hoped that generating -al
and moving the {$implicitexceptions off} around to narrow it to a
single function,
I would get a small enough asm diff to tell....
But even narrowing it down to a single "end;" statement that needs to
have {$implicitexceptions off} does not help.
This line affects the entire specialization of a base class for one of
the classes in that unit. (I did -Si- too)
So the diff is still to big, and many of the changes are outside of
what I can judge to be ok or not.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
