Thanks for all the replies, i will try to formulate an agrigate response.
On 3/3/06, Rodrigo Palhano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > but not losing the focus, Pascal is a very modern language. > > On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 15:29:21 -0300, Micha Nelissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:14:41 +0100 (Romance Standard Time) > > Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > That's simply not true. C++ has multiple inheritance, > >> > >> Solved by interfaces in a much cleaner way. > > > > That doesn't solve the same problem. MI is much more powerful, but also > > much more complex, and easily abused so that code maintainability goes > > *down* instead of up. > > > >> > templates, > >> > >> Agreed, but absolutely not essential. It just saves typing. > > > > That's an opinion, not a fact ;-). > > > >> > classes in shared libraries > >> > >> So does FPC if you so desire ? The RTL can be compiled as a shared lib, > >> and that includes Classes... > > > > This is *very* recent stuff. Is it in 2.0.x yet? Does lazarus work > > properly > > with a shared LCL library ? > > > > Micha > > _______________________________________________ > > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > > > > > > -- > Rodrigo Palhano > --------------------------------- > Equipe SpeedCASE > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal