In our previous episode, Cox, Stuart TRAN:EX said: > In all of this discussion, shouldn't the point be that the passing an > un-initialized variable is correctly being reported as a possible error > (of limited severity)?
The procedure in question is a typical initialisation. But because it is more library oriented, it pops up. But I agree with Jonas. The problem is the obsession to eliminate each and every warning, not the hint/warning. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
