Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb: > Marco van de Voort wrote: >> But I agree with Jonas. The problem is the obsession to eliminate >> each and every warning, not the hint/warning. > > I fully agree with JoshyFun. It's nothing to do with obsession. I you > keep getting thousands of "useless" hints you will eventually start > ignoring them, and that is probably the time you will miss a REAL hint > or warning that pops up between those thousands of useless ones. I don't > have the time to seek through all my 200,000+ lines of code looking for > what is 'real' hints and what is 'fake' hints. > > I don't see any problem in trying to write code with no hints & > warnings. That's simply clean code!
If hints are really important, they would be warnings. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
