i dont have a win64 machine to test this...
2010/5/25 Bee Jay <bee.ogra...@gmail.com>: > > On 25 Mei 2010, at 15:55, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > >> The CGI gateway is on my todo list, as you know. > > Now everybody knows. ;) > >> Obviously. I think ExtPascal is promising, but sadly suffers from some major >> design flaws (garbage collect, thread model); which prevent me from >> using it: they can (and do) lead to serious memory corruption. > > I'm maintaining 2 FCGI apps using CGI gateway. The FCGI app will terminate > itself after being idle for 30 minutes. So far, everything is fine. Though I > must admit that once in a while it just hung up but it very rarely happened. > According to the app log, it only happen twice last year, which made me have > to kill it manually. Well, I can live with that. :D Maybe it's because the > suspected memory corruption as you said? > > Could you point out which code exactly that lead to serious memory > corruption? I could propose code review to Wanderlan if I can prove it. > >> I still follow its progress, but see no signs that the design flaws will be >> fixed, even with the recent refactorings :/ > > > Wanderlan is an open minded person. If you could prove the arguments, he will > listen up to you. ;) > > -Bee- > > _______________________________________________ > fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pas...@lists.freepascal.org > http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal > _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
