2010/12/29 David Emerson <dle...@angelbase.com>: > suppose I define an operator: > > operator + (a: one_type; b: another_type) : one_type; > > Is there any way to specify that it should be "commutative", so I don't have > to > additionally define the reverse: > > operator + (a: another_type; b: one_type) : one_type; IIRC you don't have to.
-- bflm freepascal-bits.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
