On Wed 29 Dec 2010, Honza wrote: > 2010/12/29 David Emerson <dle...@angelbase.com>: > > suppose I define an operator: > > > > operator + (a: one_type; b: another_type) : one_type; > > > > Is there any way to specify that it should be "commutative", so I don't > > have to > > additionally define the reverse: > > > > operator + (a: another_type; b: one_type) : one_type; > IIRC you don't have to.
well... I do have to. I get "can't determine which overloaded function to call" because I have a lot of similar-looking functions and := operators it's not such a big deal, really. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
