Am Saturday 11 August 2012 14:15:11 schrieb Martin: > > I do not read all discussions. > > Which exactly headline has it? > > Does it affect the possibility to get the information I want? > > Re: [fpc-devel] Re: Class field reordering
The searched procedure/function is not a class procedure or function. > No it does not help on your topic. It is about assuming that behaviour > based on the current compiler implementation will never change.... Where do I say that? > You assume the compiler will always use the same asm-opcode for the > call. No. > Or at least you assume that if it changes, you can change it too. Yes, very quickly! > But future compilers (or maybe even the current, depending on > optimization ?) may use different asm opcodes within the same exe, to > make the call, and they may mix different ways of encoding the address. I switched off optimizations. I think I am able to handle more than one way to find a call to a function/procedure. But at this time I found only one way in my program so far. So there was no need to search for other ways... > If that changes, then your code fails. I can easily adopt the code then. There are not many different ways for a call. http://css.csail.mit.edu/6.858/2011/readings/i386/CALL.htm _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
