On 11/08/2012 13:32, Rainer Stratmann wrote:
Am Saturday 11 August 2012 14:15:11 schrieb Martin:
If that changes, then your code fails.
I can easily adopt the code then.
There are not many different ways for a call.
http://css.csail.mit.edu/6.858/2011/readings/i386/CALL.htm
Yes, so the amount of effort may increase drastically. New CPU may bring
new ways too.
And with each added way, the already existing risk of false positives
(the byte sequence can occur as subset of another statement, and then it
isn't a call at all) does increase.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
