Am Sunday 12 August 2012 09:49:36 schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior: > Why do you need to "Get all caller addresses of a given function procedure" > ? If you read the thread you will now. Because I need an easy handling multi language interface.
> This can be solved with static code analysis - as long as there is no > procedural variables involved How can it be done easily? I think we discuss it already in the mentioned thread. > - but its weird to have such a > necessity... For the above mentioned purpose it works perfect since some days. I got all caller adresses and even more I got all text snippets (pchar to the snippet!). If you know something about assembler language then it is not a huge effort to get this information from the compiled code. > Sounds like the project started with the wrong > assumptions... The project has already started 20 years ago... So there can not be very much wrong if it is still working. > Thats my two cents... > > 2012/8/11 Rainer Stratmann <rainerstratm...@t-online.de>: > > Am Saturday 11 August 2012 19:18:39 schrieb Jorge Aldo G. de F. Junior: > >> Sorry for posting without bringing a solution, but i am curious, why > >> do you need this ? > >> > >> Doesnt sound like good programming practice... > > > > See Thread: > > "Get all caller adresses of a given function/procedure before executing" > > We did not find a solution there I feel comfortable with so I decide to > > check the code directly. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal